Binding law — in force
Recommendation and generation services must protect minors and must not induce their internet addiction (China)
Under China's Algorithmic Recommendation Provisions Art. 18, providers serving minors must fulfil minors' online-protection duties, including by developing modes suited to minors and services suited to their characteristics; must not push minors information that may lead them to imitate unsafe or anti-social conduct or induce bad habits; and must not use algorithmic recommendation to induce minors' internet addiction. Detect age signals the product holds that never reach the AI session policy through a minor profile.
Who it applies to
- Duty falls on: provider
- Providers of algorithmic recommendation services in China. Art. 2 lists generation-synthesis algorithms among covered techniques, so generative AI services that provide information to users can fall in scope; whether the Generative AI Interim Measures displace this for a given service is pending legal review. Effective 2022-03-01.
- Whether it applies depends on facts outside the code; a person has to decide.
The guard to add
Route every age signal the product holds into the AI session policy and apply a minor profile: tighter content, no romantic role-play, bounded engagement, frequent AI reminders.
A single policy resolver called where the AI session is built (before the system prompt or persona is chosen, the content filter level is set, and companion, role-play, or engagement features are switched on) that reads every age signal the product holds: declared birthdate, age-assurance result, platform age-range signal, an is_minor flag, and a user saying in conversation that they are a minor. When any signal indicates a minor, it returns a minor profile: a minor system prompt, stricter moderation or safety settings, romantic and sexual role-play and sexually explicit image generation off, engagement features such as streaks and nudges bounded, and AI-status and break reminders on a shorter interval. A self-disclosure mid-conversation switches the live session to the minor profile rather than waiting for the next login.
Where it goes: 1 application source code, 3 config and feature flags, 7 prompt construction, 2 data models.
What this provision adds:
- Offer a mode suited to minors (minor mode, 未成年人模式) that switches content and recommendation policy.
- Do not push minors information that may lead them to imitate unsafe or anti-social conduct or induce bad habits, and do not use recommendation to induce their internet addiction.
Example (Python companion service), before:
def start_session(user):
return ChatSession(system_prompt=COMPANION_PROMPT, roleplay_enabled=True,
streaks_enabled=True, moderation='standard')After:
def is_minor(user):
return (user.is_minor or user.age_assurance_result == 'under_18'
or (user.birthdate is not None and years_since(user.birthdate) < 18))
def start_session(user):
if is_minor(user):
return ChatSession(system_prompt=MINOR_SYSTEM_PROMPT, roleplay_enabled=False,
streaks_enabled=False, moderation='strict',
reminder_interval=MINOR_REMINDER_INTERVAL)
return ChatSession(system_prompt=COMPANION_PROMPT, roleplay_enabled=True,
streaks_enabled=True, moderation='standard')Control: AI experience ignores age signals it already has. The same guard addresses 3 items with binding law in 2 jurisdictions. Engineering guidance, not legal advice.
Related incidents
- Character.AI and Google agree in principle to settle teen-harm suits (2026-01-07; confirmed). Character.AI and Google agreed in principle to settle five lawsuits brought by families alleging that chatbot interactions contributed to teenagers' suicides or harm. Terms were not disclosed and there was no admission of liability; the underlying harms remain allegations. Source: Fortune · evidence grade: press of record · cited by Apply minor-appropriate AI settings whenever the product already has an age signal
- FTC opens a 6(b) study of AI companion chatbots' engagement practices and effects on minors (2025-09-11; confirmed). On September 11, 2025 the FTC voted 3-0 to issue 6(b) orders to seven companies (Alphabet, Character Technologies, Instagram, Meta, OpenAI, Snap and X.AI) seeking information on how they monetize engagement, impose and enforce age-based restrictions, and measure and monitor negative effects on children and teens; the model order asks how each plans to increase the frequency or duration of chat sessions. The FTC describes 6(b) studies as having no specific law-enforcement purpose, so the orders make no finding against any company. Source: U.S. Federal Trade Commission (press release, 2025-09-11) · evidence grade: primary · cited by Apply minor-appropriate AI settings whenever the product already has an age signal
Rule id cn-algo-recommendation.minor-protection · review status: primary source derived