Market
AI law in Montana
4 binding provisions TwinEthos encodes that reach Montana (US-MT): 4 in force, 0 enacted but not yet applying. Start from the guards to add.
Informational data, not legal advice. Summaries and rules have not been reviewed by a lawyer: always verify official law text for decisions. A suggested guard is intended to address each rule; adding it is not a statement of compliance to that law.
Includes US federal law, which applies in every state. See also United States (federal).
Get the build plan for Montana
The guards that cover the most here
46 guards address 62 items across 2 jurisdictions with binding law: 4 binding law in force, 0 enacted but not yet applying, 34 standards and frameworks, 24 TwinEthos recommended guardrails.
AI agent configured to pose as, or claim affiliation with, a government body or a business it does not represent
Make the agent's persona, greeting, and scripts name only the operating organization, and never instruct it to claim a government or third-party business identity or endorsement.
Addresses 1 item: 1 binding law in force
Law in force in United States (federal) (US).
Health information sent to an external AI vendor without the contractual or legal basis the law requires
Send identifiable health data only to AI endpoints registered with a signed BAA or processing agreement and retention and training off; otherwise de-identify first.
Addresses 1 item: 1 binding law in force
Law in force in United States (federal) (US).
More health information than the task needs is sent to an AI model
Build AI prompts, context and fine-tuning rows from a per-task allowlist of health-record fields, never by serializing a whole patient record or FHIR bundle.
Addresses 1 item: 1 binding law in force
Law in force in United States (federal) (US).
Profiling for significant-effects decisions with no opt-out
Store a consumer's profiling opt-out (and a Global Privacy Control signal where honored) and check it before profiling outputs feed any significant-effects decision.
Addresses 1 item: 1 binding law in force
Law in force in Montana (US-MT).
Adverse AI decision without explanation/appeal
Send each adverse AI-assisted decision with its main reasons and the AI's role, plus a way to correct data and appeal to a human who can change the outcome.
Addresses 3 items: 2 standards · 1 recommended guardrail
AI chat interaction without disclosure
Show an AI-identity notice at or before the first assistant turn, in the UI or as the opening message, and answer truthfully when asked if it is a bot.
Addresses 3 items: 2 standards · 1 recommended guardrail
GenAI in consequential decisions without confabulation/output-validation controls
Validate GenAI output against a schema and its cited sources, and send unverifiable claims to review, before it drives a consequential decision or record.
Addresses 3 items: 2 standards · 1 recommended guardrail
GenAI with untracked third-party components (value chain)
Keep an inventory of every third-party model, dataset, package, plugin, and MCP server with pinned versions, its reviewed model card or vendor due-diligence record, and an owner.
Addresses 3 items: 2 standards · 1 recommended guardrail
Untrusted content influences instructions or tools
Keep fetched, retrieved, and tool-returned content out of the system prompt, pass it as delimited data, and restrict which tools a turn holding that content can call.
Addresses 3 items: 2 standards · 1 recommended guardrail
Agent actions not traceable to identity and owner
Give each agent its own credential and a registry entry naming an accountable owner, and log every tool action with agent_id, owner, action, target, and timestamp.
Addresses 2 items: 1 standard · 1 recommended guardrail
The top 10 of 46; the build plan ranks all of them and lets you narrow by AI feature.
By AI feature
Plans for one feature in Montana:
- Chat or assistant
- Agents that use tools or take actions
- Decisions about people (hiring, credit, insurance, health)
- Generated text, images, audio or video
- Classification, scoring or biometrics
Laws
- FTC Impersonation Rule (16 CFR Part 461) United States (federal) (US)
- HIPAA Privacy Rule (45 CFR 160, 164 Subpart E) United States (federal) (US)
- US State Privacy Laws — Profiling Opt-Out (Virginia-model) Colorado (US-CO), Connecticut (US-CT), Delaware (US-DE), Florida (US-FL), Indiana (US-IN), Kentucky (US-KY), Maryland (US-MD), Minnesota (US-MN), Montana (US-MT), Nebraska (US-NE), New Hampshire (US-NH), New Jersey (US-NJ), Oregon (US-OR), Rhode Island (US-RI), Tennessee (US-TN), Texas (US-TX), Virginia (US-VA)
Informational data, not legal advice. Summaries are TwinEthos's own words and rules have not been reviewed by a lawyer: check the official text before relying on any of it. A guard addresses an item; adding it is not a statement that your code meets any law.