Binding law — in force
Tell users whether AI made or drove a decision, explain how it was reached, and let them challenge it before a competent person (El Salvador, DL 234 Art. 18)
El Salvador's Law for the Promotion of AI and Technologies (Legislative Decree 234) Art. 18 provides that where AI is used commercially or to access rights or services in the Republic, the user must be told whether the decision was taken directly by AI or driven by it (an AI-driven decision is one with a significant AI contribution, alone or with human operators, Art. 4(i)); the notification must contain understandable and transparent explanations of how the decision was reached, and there must be mechanisms to challenge it before a competent natural person who can confirm, modify or revoke it. Compliance is a condition for the Law's safeguards (Art. 19). Detect a model-driven decision sent to the person with no AI-decision notice or challenge route.
sv-dl-234.ai-decision-notice-explanation-and-human-challenge · DL 234, Art. 18 (AI decisions: notice, explanation and challenge before a natural person) · official source · jurisdictions: SV