Binding law — in force
Peru's Regulation of Law 31814 Art. 25.3 requires that, where a high-risk AI system takes decisions affecting human rights, the explanation of its results be guaranteed to the affected users through mechanisms that let them understand the criteria and key factors used in the automated decision, in language accessible to the user. For private developers and implementers it applies in phases by sector from 2026-09-10. Detect a model-driven adverse decision with no stored criteria or key factors.
pe-ai-regulation.high-risk-decision-explanation · Regulation of Law 31814, Art. 25.3 (explanation of results of decisions affecting human rights) · official source · jurisdictions: PE
The guard to add, and how far to trust this rule
Binding law — in force
Peru's Regulation of Law 31814 Art. 25.1 requires the developer or implementer of a high-risk AI system to establish mechanisms for algorithmic transparency that inform the user in advance, clearly and simply, of the system's purpose or use, its main functions and the type of decisions it can take; Art. 25.2 adds that these may include visible labelling informing users beforehand that the product, service or content operates on AI, with its main capabilities and limitations, except for internal administrative support with no direct impact on decisions affecting rights or services. For private developers and implementers the duty applies in phases by sector from 2026-09-10. Detect a model used in hiring, credit, health or admission decisions with no prior AI notice in the flow.
pe-ai-regulation.high-risk-prior-information-and-label · Regulation of Law 31814, Art. 25.1-25.2 (algorithmic transparency: prior, clear information to users; visible labelling) · official source · jurisdictions: PE
The guard to add, and how far to trust this rule
Binding law — in force
Peru's Regulation of Law 31814 Art. 31 requires developers and implementers of high-risk AI systems to keep an up-to-date, accessible, preventive record of the system's operating principles, data sources, algorithmic logic and expected social and ethical impacts (31.1), and to implement human oversight in decisions with significant impact in health, education, justice, finance and access to basic programmes and services, with staff trained not to be biased by the system's results and able to stop, correct or invalidate its decisions (31.4). For private developers and implementers it applies in phases by sector from 2026-09-10. Detect a model whose output sets a decision status with no review, override or stop path.
pe-ai-regulation.high-risk-record-and-human-oversight · Regulation of Law 31814, Art. 31.4 (human oversight able to stop, correct or invalidate high-risk decisions) · official source · jurisdictions: PE
The guard to add, and how far to trust this rule
Binding law — in force
Peru's Regulation of Law 31814 (Supreme Decree 115-2025-PCM) Art. 23.1(d) prohibits, as improper use, AI systems intended to analyse, classify or infer people's sensitive data from their biometric data to deduce or infer racial or ethnic origin, political opinions, trade union membership, religious or philosophical beliefs, sex life or sexual orientation, and to evaluate or classify people or groups where that causes or contributes to discriminatory or disproportionate results that violate fundamental rights. Detect a face or voice pipeline that computes a race, religion, sexual-orientation or political label.
pe-ai-regulation.no-sensitive-trait-inference-from-biometrics · Regulation of Law 31814, Art. 23.1(d) (prohibited: inferring sensitive traits from biometric data; discriminatory classification) · official source · jurisdictions: PE
The guard to add, and how far to trust this rule
