TwinEthos homeAPI access

Catalog

Indiana SEA 480 (P.L. 144-2025; IC 27-1-37.5-20)

Indiana Department of Insurance · pack 0.2.0 · verified against the official source as of 2026-10-04. AI-adjacent group: general privacy or biometric law, included only where AI data flows trigger it. Open it in the explorer.

Binding law — in force

Only a clinical peer makes a medical-necessity adverse determination or decides an appeal (Indiana SEA 480)

From 2025-07-01, a utilization review entity must ensure that every adverse determination based on medical necessity (a decision to deny, reduce or terminate coverage of a health care service, IC 27-1-37.5-1.5) is made, and every appeal reviewed and decided, by a clinical peer under the clinical direction of a medical director who is an Indiana-licensed physician (IC 27-1-37.5-20(a)); an appeal may not be decided by a peer with a financial interest or who made the determination (20(b)), and an adverse determination must give specific reasons and suggested alternatives (23(c)). The chapter never mentions AI: it binds whatever tool proposes the outcome. Detect model or scoring output that sets an adverse determination with no clinical-peer decision.

in-sb480.clinical-peer-makes-adverse-determinations · IC 27-1-37.5-20(a) · official source · jurisdictions: US-IN

The guard to add, and how far to trust this rule