TwinEthos homeRequest access

Catalog

China PIPL Art. 24 (automated decision-making)

Cyberspace Administration of China and departments performing personal-information protection duties · pack 0.2.0 · verified against the official source as of 2026-10-02. AI-adjacent group: general privacy or biometric law, included only where AI data flows trigger it. Open it in the explorer.

Binding law — in force

Automated push and marketing must offer an option not based on personal characteristics, or an easy way to refuse (China PIPL)

Where a personal information handler pushes information or markets to individuals by automated decision-making, it must at the same time offer an option that is not targeted at the individual's personal characteristics, or give the individual a convenient way to refuse (Art. 24(2)). Automated decision-making means computer programs automatically analysing and assessing a person's behaviour, interests or economic, health or credit status and deciding (Art. 73(2)). Detect personalised feed, push or marketing calls with no non-personalised option or refusal.

cn-pipl-adm.push-marketing-non-personalised-option · 中华人民共和国个人信息保护法 第二十四条第二款 (Art. 24(2), non-personalised option or refusal for automated push and marketing) · official source · jurisdictions: CN

The guard to add, and how far to trust this rule

Binding law — in force

Individuals may demand an explanation of automated decisions with significant effects and refuse decisions made solely by automation (China PIPL)

Where a decision that significantly affects an individual's rights and interests is made by automated decision-making, the individual may require the personal information handler to explain it and may refuse to have the handler make decisions solely by automated decision-making (Art. 24(3)). Detect model output that becomes a significant decision with no explanation request route and no way to have a person decide instead.

cn-pipl-adm.significant-decision-explanation-and-refusal · 中华人民共和国个人信息保护法 第二十四条第三款 (Art. 24(3), explanation and refusal of solely automated significant decisions) · official source · jurisdictions: CN

The guard to add, and how far to trust this rule