BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//FloatingKey LLC//TwinEthos explorer//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:TwinEthos: AI law coming into force
X-WR-CALDESC:Enacted AI law that starts applying after 2026-10-01. Informat
 ional data\, not legal advice\; check the official source.
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:2026-10-01@coming-into-force.twinethos.com
DTSTAMP:20261001T000000Z
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20261001
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20261002
SUMMARY:US-CT: Large GenAI providers must embed tamper-resistant provenance
  data (Connecticut)
DESCRIPTION:- US-CT: Large GenAI providers must embed tamper-resistant prov
 enance data (Connecticut) (Conn. PA 26-15 Sec. 15(b))\; further phase of l
 aw in force. Guard to add: Mark every generated image\, audio\, video\, or
  text output with machine-readable provenance\, such as a signed C2PA mani
 fest or watermark\, before it is saved\, served\, or published. https://ww
 w.twinethos.com/explore/law/ct-cart/#ct-cart.synthetic-content-provenance\
 n\nInformational data\, not legal advice: check the official source before
  relying on any of it. Radar: https://www.twinethos.com/explore/coming/
URL:https://www.twinethos.com/explore/coming/
TRANSP:TRANSPARENT
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:2026-12-02@coming-into-force.twinethos.com
DTSTAMP:20261001T000000Z
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20261202
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20261203
SUMMARY:2 AI-law obligations start (EU)
DESCRIPTION:- EU: AI generating non-consensual intimate imagery or CSAM is 
 prohibited (EU AI Act Art. 5(1)(ba)\,(bb)) (Article 5(1)(ba)\,(bb) [as ins
 erted by Reg. (EU) 2026/1744])\; starts applying. Guard to add: Classify p
 rompts\, uploads\, and outputs for sexual content and minors on every imag
 e\, video\, or audio generation path\, refuse sexual edits of real people\
 , and keep a misuse-report route. https://www.twinethos.com/explore/law/eu
 -ai-act/#eu-ai-act.art5.nonconsensual-intimate-and-csam\n- EU: Synthetic A
 I output must be machine-readably marked as artificial (Article 50(2))\; f
 urther phase of law in force. Guard to add: Mark every generated image\, a
 udio\, video\, or text output with machine-readable provenance\, such as a
  signed C2PA manifest or watermark\, before it is saved\, served\, or publ
 ished. https://www.twinethos.com/explore/law/eu-ai-act/#eu-ai-act.art50.sy
 nthetic-content-machine-marking\n\nInformational data\, not legal advice: 
 check the official source before relying on any of it. Radar: https://www.
 twinethos.com/explore/coming/
URL:https://www.twinethos.com/explore/coming/
TRANSP:TRANSPARENT
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:2027-01-01@coming-into-force.twinethos.com
DTSTAMP:20261001T000000Z
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20270101
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20270102
SUMMARY:22 AI-law obligations start (US-CA\, US-CO\, US-CT\, US-IL\, US-NY\
 , US-OR and 1 more)
DESCRIPTION:- US-CA: GenAI hosting platforms must not distribute systems th
 at omit disclosures (California) (Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code 22757.3.2(a))\; s
 tarts applying. Guard to add: Embed a signed C2PA manifest or equivalent l
 atent disclosure in generated or captured media when it is created\, and d
 o not distribute systems or files that lack it. https://www.twinethos.com/
 explore/law/ca-ab853/#ca-ab853.genai-hosting-platform-gate\n- US-CA: Large
  online platforms must detect and display content provenance (California) 
 (Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code 22757.3.1(a))\; starts applying. Guard to add: Rea
 d embedded C2PA provenance on upload\, preserve it through media processin
 g\, and show users a Content Credentials indicator with a way to inspect t
 he data. https://www.twinethos.com/explore/law/ca-ab853/#ca-ab853.platform
 -provenance-detection-and-display\n- US-CA: Consumers requesting access to
  ADMT must receive a plain-language explanation (11 CCR 7200(a)-(b))\; sta
 rts applying. Guard to add: Store each ADMT decision's purpose\, logic\, o
 utput\, and use at decision time\, and return them in plain language from 
 a consumer access-request path. https://www.twinethos.com/explore/law/ccpa
 -admt/#ccpa-admt.access-explanation\n- US-CA: Consumers must be able to op
 t out of automated decision technology (11 CCR 7010(c)-(d))\; starts apply
 ing. Guard to add: Offer an ADMT opt-out (or a qualifying human appeal)\, 
 store the consumer's choice\, and check it before the model runs on any si
 gnificant-decision path. https://www.twinethos.com/explore/law/ccpa-admt/#
 ccpa-admt.opt-out\n- US-CA: Automated decision technology requires pre-use
  notice (11 CCR 7010(c)-(d))\; starts applying. Guard to add: Send the per
 son an AI-use notice on the decision path\, before or when an AI system ma
 kes or substantially factors a consequential decision about them\, and rec
 ord its delivery. https://www.twinethos.com/explore/law/ccpa-admt/#ccpa-ad
 mt.pre-use-notice\n- US-CO: Adverse ADMT outcomes require a 30-day plain-l
 anguage explanation (C.R.S. 6-1-1704(3))\; stayed: would apply from this d
 ate. Guard to add: Send each adverse AI-assisted decision with its main re
 asons and the AI's role\, plus a way to correct data and appeal to a human
  who can change the outcome. https://www.twinethos.com/explore/law/co-sb26
 -189/#co-sb26-189.adverse-outcome-explanation\n- US-CO: Deployers must giv
 e point-of-interaction notice when covered ADMT influences a consequential
  decision (C.R.S. 6-1-1704(1))\; stayed: would apply from this date. Guard
  to add: Send the person an AI-use notice on the decision path\, before or
  when an AI system makes or substantially factors a consequential decision
  about them\, and record its delivery. https://www.twinethos.com/explore/l
 aw/co-sb26-189/#co-sb26-189.consumer-notice-consequential-decision\n- US-C
 O: Developers of covered ADMT must document intended uses\, training data\
 , and limitations for deployers (C.R.S. 6-1-1702(1))\; stayed: would apply
  from this date. Guard to add: Ship a deployer-facing model card or deploy
 er guide with each ADMT release covering intended uses\, training-data cat
 egories\, limitations\, and human-review instructions. https://www.twineth
 os.com/explore/law/co-sb26-189/#co-sb26-189.developer-documentation-to-dep
 loyers\n- US-CO: Consumers can request human review and data correction af
 ter an adverse ADMT decision (C.R.S. 6-1-1705(1))\; stayed: would apply fr
 om this date. Guard to add: Give people who receive an adverse AI-influenc
 ed decision a way to see and correct the data used and to request human re
 view that can change the outcome. https://www.twinethos.com/explore/law/co
 -sb26-189/#co-sb26-189.human-review-and-data-correction\n- US-CT: AI compa
 nions must maintain a suicide/self-harm crisis protocol (Connecticut) (Con
 n. PA 26-15 Sec. 5(a))\; starts applying. Guard to add: Screen every user 
 message for suicidal ideation and self-harm\, return a crisis referral ins
 tead of the normal reply on detection\, and block encouragement or method 
 content. https://www.twinethos.com/explore/law/ct-cart/#ct-cart.ai-compani
 on-crisis-protocol\n- US-CT: AI companions must disclose they are not huma
 n (Connecticut) (Conn. PA 26-15 Sec. 5(b))\; starts applying. Guard to add
 : Show an AI-identity notice at or before the first assistant turn\, in th
 e UI or as the opening message\, and answer truthfully when asked if it is
  a bot. https://www.twinethos.com/explore/law/ct-cart/#ct-cart.ai-companio
 n-disclosure\n- US-IL: Frontier developers must report critical safety inc
 idents to Illinois within 72 hours\, or 24 hours if lives are at imminent 
 risk (Illinois SB 315) (IL PA 104-0538\, Sec. 15(c))\; starts applying. Gu
 ard to add: Keep a critical safety incident runbook that classifies the de
 fined incident classes and runs the 72-hour report and 24-hour imminent-ri
 sk escalation clocks. https://www.twinethos.com/explore/law/il-sb315/#il-s
 b315.critical-safety-incident-reporting\n- US-IL: Large frontier developer
 s must publish and follow a frontier AI framework from 2028 (Illinois SB 3
 15) (IL PA 104-0538\, Sec. 10(a))\; starts applying. Guard to add: Publish
  a frontier AI framework covering capability thresholds\, mitigations\, in
 cident response\, and internal-use risk\, and gate model releases on it. h
 ttps://www.twinethos.com/explore/law/il-sb315/#il-sb315.frontier-ai-framew
 ork\n- US-IL: Frontier developers must publish a transparency report at de
 ployment\, with machine-readable risk summaries (Illinois SB 315) (IL PA 1
 04-0538\, Sec. 10(c)(1))\; starts applying. Guard to add: Publish a transp
 arency report or system card on the developer's website before or at each 
 new or substantially modified frontier-model deployment\, and gate release
  on it. https://www.twinethos.com/explore/law/il-sb315/#il-sb315.transpare
 ncy-report\n- US-IL: Frontier developers must not gag or retaliate against
  AI safety whistleblowers (Illinois SB 315) (IL PA 104-0538\, Sec. 20(a))\
 ; starts applying. Guard to add: Carve AI-safety and legal-violation discl
 osures out of every NDA and policy\, adopt non-retaliation\, and run an in
 ternal safety-concern channel for covered employees. https://www.twinethos
 .com/explore/law/il-sb315/#il-sb315.whistleblower-protection\n- US-NY: Fro
 ntier developers must report critical safety incidents within 72 hours\, o
 r 24 hours if lives are at imminent risk (New York RAISE Act) (N.Y. Gen. B
 us. Law 1422(3)(a)-(b))\; starts applying. Guard to add: Keep a critical s
 afety incident runbook that classifies the defined incident classes and ru
 ns the 72-hour report and 24-hour imminent-risk escalation clocks. https:/
 /www.twinethos.com/explore/law/ny-raise-act/#ny-raise-act.critical-safety-
 incident-reporting\n- US-NY: Large frontier developers must publish and fo
 llow a frontier AI framework (New York RAISE Act) (N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law 1421
 (1))\; starts applying. Guard to add: Publish a frontier AI framework cove
 ring capability thresholds\, mitigations\, incident response\, and interna
 l-use risk\, and gate model releases on it. https://www.twinethos.com/expl
 ore/law/ny-raise-act/#ny-raise-act.frontier-ai-framework\n- US-NY: Frontie
 r developers must publish a transparency report when deploying a new or su
 bstantially modified frontier model (New York RAISE Act) (N.Y. Gen. Bus. L
 aw 1421(3)(a))\; starts applying. Guard to add: Publish a transparency rep
 ort or system card on the developer's website before or at each new or sub
 stantially modified frontier-model deployment\, and gate release on it. ht
 tps://www.twinethos.com/explore/law/ny-raise-act/#ny-raise-act.transparenc
 y-report\n- US-OR: AI companions must maintain a self-harm crisis protocol
  with 988 referral (Oregon) (Oregon SB 1546 (2026)\, Section 1(3))\; start
 s applying. Guard to add: Screen every user message for suicidal ideation 
 and self-harm\, return a crisis referral instead of the normal reply on de
 tection\, and block encouragement or method content. https://www.twinethos
 .com/explore/law/or-sb1546/#or-sb1546.ai-companion-crisis-protocol\n- US-O
 R: AI companions must disclose non-human interaction (Oregon) (Oregon SB 1
 546 (2026)\, Section 1(2))\; starts applying. Guard to add: Show an AI-ide
 ntity notice at or before the first assistant turn\, in the UI or as the o
 pening message\, and answer truthfully when asked if it is a bot. https://
 www.twinethos.com/explore/law/or-sb1546/#or-sb1546.ai-companion-disclosure
 \n- US-WA: AI companion chatbots must maintain a self-harm crisis protocol
  (Washington) (Washington HB 2225 (2026)\, Section 5)\; starts applying. G
 uard to add: Screen every user message for suicidal ideation and self-harm
 \, return a crisis referral instead of the normal reply on detection\, and
  block encouragement or method content. https://www.twinethos.com/explore/
 law/wa-hb2225/#wa-hb2225.ai-companion-crisis-protocol\n- US-WA: AI compani
 on chatbots must disclose they are not human (Washington) (Washington HB 2
 225 (2026)\, Section 3)\; starts applying. Guard to add: Show an AI-identi
 ty notice at or before the first assistant turn\, in the UI or as the open
 ing message\, and answer truthfully when asked if it is a bot. https://www
 .twinethos.com/explore/law/wa-hb2225/#wa-hb2225.ai-companion-disclosure\n\
 nInformational data\, not legal advice: check the official source before r
 elying on any of it. Radar: https://www.twinethos.com/explore/coming/
URL:https://www.twinethos.com/explore/coming/
TRANSP:TRANSPARENT
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:2027-07-01@coming-into-force.twinethos.com
DTSTAMP:20261001T000000Z
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20270701
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20270702
SUMMARY:3 AI-law obligations start (US-NE)
DESCRIPTION:- US-NE: Conversational AI must adopt a self-harm crisis-referr
 al protocol (Nebraska) (Nebraska LB 525\, Sec. 16)\; starts applying. Guar
 d to add: Screen every user message for suicidal ideation and self-harm\, 
 return a crisis referral instead of the normal reply on detection\, and bl
 ock encouragement or method content. https://www.twinethos.com/explore/law
 /ne-lb525/#ne-lb525.conversational-ai-crisis-protocol\n- US-NE: Conversati
 onal AI must disclose it is not human when a user could be misled (Nebrask
 a) (Nebraska LB 525\, Sec. 15 (Conversational AI Safety Act))\; starts app
 lying. Guard to add: Show an AI-identity notice at or before the first ass
 istant turn\, in the UI or as the opening message\, and answer truthfully 
 when asked if it is a bot. https://www.twinethos.com/explore/law/ne-lb525/
 #ne-lb525.conversational-ai-disclosure\n- US-NE: Conversational AI must no
 t claim to provide professional mental health care (Nebraska) (Nebraska LB
  525\, Sec. 17)\; starts applying. Guard to add: Strip claims that the AI 
 is a licensed therapist or provides professional mental health care from i
 ts prompts\, replies\, product name\, UI\, and listings. https://www.twine
 thos.com/explore/law/ne-lb525/#ne-lb525.no-mental-health-care-representati
 on\n\nInformational data\, not legal advice: check the official source bef
 ore relying on any of it. Radar: https://www.twinethos.com/explore/coming/
URL:https://www.twinethos.com/explore/coming/
TRANSP:TRANSPARENT
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:2027-10-01@coming-into-force.twinethos.com
DTSTAMP:20261001T000000Z
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20271001
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20271002
SUMMARY:US-CT: AEDT deployers must give employees a pre-decision notice (Co
 nnecticut)
DESCRIPTION:- US-CT: AEDT deployers must give employees a pre-decision noti
 ce (Connecticut) (Conn. PA 26-15 Sec. 10)\; starts applying. Guard to add:
  Send the person an AI-use notice on the decision path\, before or when an
  AI system makes or substantially factors a consequential decision about t
 hem\, and record its delivery. https://www.twinethos.com/explore/law/ct-ca
 rt/#ct-cart.aedt-predecision-notice\n\nInformational data\, not legal advi
 ce: check the official source before relying on any of it. Radar: https://
 www.twinethos.com/explore/coming/
URL:https://www.twinethos.com/explore/coming/
TRANSP:TRANSPARENT
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:2027-12-02@coming-into-force.twinethos.com
DTSTAMP:20261001T000000Z
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20271202
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20271203
SUMMARY:6 AI-law obligations start (EU)
DESCRIPTION:- EU: High-risk AI training data must be governed and examined 
 for bias (EU AI Act Art. 10) (Article 10(2))\; starts applying. Guard to a
 dd: Compute per-group accuracy and bias metrics in the training pipeline o
 f every consequential-decision model\, keep the results per version\, and 
 rerun them on a schedule. https://www.twinethos.com/explore/law/eu-ai-act/
 #eu-ai-act.art10.data-governance-bias\n- EU: High-risk AI systems must aut
 omatically log events for traceability (EU AI Act Art. 12) (Article 12)\; 
 starts applying. Guard to add: Write a structured event record for every i
 nference and decision of the high-risk system (when\, model version\, inpu
 t reference\, output\, operator) to a log store with explicit retention. h
 ttps://www.twinethos.com/explore/law/eu-ai-act/#eu-ai-act.art12.record-kee
 ping\n- EU: High-risk AI systems must be designed for effective human over
 sight with override and stop (EU AI Act Art. 14) (Article 14)\; starts app
 lying. Guard to add: Give a human a working way to review and overturn eac
 h consequential AI decision: a pending-review step before it takes effect 
 and an override that restores the prior state. https://www.twinethos.com/e
 xplore/law/eu-ai-act/#eu-ai-act.art14.human-oversight\n- EU: High-risk AI 
 systems must be accurate\, robust\, and secure against AI-specific attacks
  (EU AI Act Art. 15) (Article 15)\; starts applying. Guard to add: Declare
  accuracy metrics per model version\, add a fail-safe fallback\, gate retr
 aining on verified labels\, and defend against poisoning\, adversarial inp
 ut and tampering. https://www.twinethos.com/explore/law/eu-ai-act/#eu-ai-a
 ct.art15.accuracy-robustness-cybersecurity\n- EU: Deployers must inform pe
 ople they are subject to a high-risk AI decision (EU AI Act Art. 26(11)) (
 Article 26(11))\; starts applying. Guard to add: Send the person an AI-use
  notice on the decision path\, before or when an AI system makes or substa
 ntially factors a consequential decision about them\, and record its deliv
 ery. https://www.twinethos.com/explore/law/eu-ai-act/#eu-ai-act.art26.info
 rm-affected-persons\n- EU: Public-sector and essential-service deployers m
 ust run a fundamental rights impact assessment (EU AI Act Art. 27) (Articl
 e 27(1))\; starts applying. Guard to add: Complete an impact assessment of
  a high-impact AI deployment's benefits\, risks to affected people\, mitig
 ations\, and oversight before first use\, and keep it current. https://www
 .twinethos.com/explore/law/eu-ai-act/#eu-ai-act.art27.fria\n\nInformationa
 l data\, not legal advice: check the official source before relying on any
  of it. Radar: https://www.twinethos.com/explore/coming/
URL:https://www.twinethos.com/explore/coming/
TRANSP:TRANSPARENT
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:2028-01-01@coming-into-force.twinethos.com
DTSTAMP:20261001T000000Z
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20280101
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20280102
SUMMARY:3 AI-law obligations start (US-CA\, US-IL)
DESCRIPTION:- US-CA: Capture device manufacturers must offer latent provena
 nce disclosure (California) (Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code 22757.3.3(a))\; starts
  applying. Guard to add: Embed a signed C2PA manifest or equivalent latent
  disclosure in generated or captured media when it is created\, and do not
  distribute systems or files that lack it. https://www.twinethos.com/explo
 re/law/ca-ab853/#ca-ab853.capture-device-latent-disclosure\n- US-IL: Large
  frontier developers must publish and follow a frontier AI framework from 
 2028 (Illinois SB 315) (IL PA 104-0538\, Sec. 10(a))\; starts applying. Gu
 ard to add: Publish a frontier AI framework covering capability thresholds
 \, mitigations\, incident response\, and internal-use risk\, and gate mode
 l releases on it. https://www.twinethos.com/explore/law/il-sb315/#il-sb315
 .frontier-ai-framework\n- US-IL: Large frontier developers must obtain and
  publish an annual independent compliance audit from 2028 (Illinois SB 315
 ) (IL PA 104-0538\, Sec. 10(d))\; starts applying. Guard to add: Engage an
  independent auditor on non-contingent fees each year to audit frontier-sa
 fety obligations\, then publish\, transmit\, and retain the signed report.
  https://www.twinethos.com/explore/law/il-sb315/#il-sb315.independent-comp
 liance-audit\n\nInformational data\, not legal advice: check the official 
 source before relying on any of it. Radar: https://www.twinethos.com/explo
 re/coming/
URL:https://www.twinethos.com/explore/coming/
TRANSP:TRANSPARENT
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:2028-08-02@coming-into-force.twinethos.com
DTSTAMP:20261001T000000Z
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20280802
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20280803
SUMMARY:4 AI-law obligations start (EU)
DESCRIPTION:- EU: High-risk AI training data must be governed and examined 
 for bias (EU AI Act Art. 10) (Article 10(2))\; starts applying. Guard to a
 dd: Compute per-group accuracy and bias metrics in the training pipeline o
 f every consequential-decision model\, keep the results per version\, and 
 rerun them on a schedule. https://www.twinethos.com/explore/law/eu-ai-act/
 #eu-ai-act.art10.data-governance-bias\n- EU: High-risk AI systems must aut
 omatically log events for traceability (EU AI Act Art. 12) (Article 12)\; 
 starts applying. Guard to add: Write a structured event record for every i
 nference and decision of the high-risk system (when\, model version\, inpu
 t reference\, output\, operator) to a log store with explicit retention. h
 ttps://www.twinethos.com/explore/law/eu-ai-act/#eu-ai-act.art12.record-kee
 ping\n- EU: High-risk AI systems must be designed for effective human over
 sight with override and stop (EU AI Act Art. 14) (Article 14)\; starts app
 lying. Guard to add: Give a human a working way to review and overturn eac
 h consequential AI decision: a pending-review step before it takes effect 
 and an override that restores the prior state. https://www.twinethos.com/e
 xplore/law/eu-ai-act/#eu-ai-act.art14.human-oversight\n- EU: High-risk AI 
 systems must be accurate\, robust\, and secure against AI-specific attacks
  (EU AI Act Art. 15) (Article 15)\; starts applying. Guard to add: Declare
  accuracy metrics per model version\, add a fail-safe fallback\, gate retr
 aining on verified labels\, and defend against poisoning\, adversarial inp
 ut and tampering. https://www.twinethos.com/explore/law/eu-ai-act/#eu-ai-a
 ct.art15.accuracy-robustness-cybersecurity\n\nInformational data\, not leg
 al advice: check the official source before relying on any of it. Radar: h
 ttps://www.twinethos.com/explore/coming/
URL:https://www.twinethos.com/explore/coming/
TRANSP:TRANSPARENT
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:2029-01-01@coming-into-force.twinethos.com
DTSTAMP:20261001T000000Z
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20290101
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20290102
SUMMARY:US-CA: GenAI providers must embed latent provenance disclosure in s
 ynthetic media (California)
DESCRIPTION:- US-CA: GenAI providers must embed latent provenance disclosur
 e in synthetic media (California) (Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code 22757.3(a))\; fu
 rther phase of law in force. Guard to add: Embed a signed C2PA manifest or
  equivalent latent disclosure in generated or captured media when it is cr
 eated\, and do not distribute systems or files that lack it. https://www.t
 winethos.com/explore/law/ca-sb942/#ca-sb942.provenance-disclosure\n\nInfor
 mational data\, not legal advice: check the official source before relying
  on any of it. Radar: https://www.twinethos.com/explore/coming/
URL:https://www.twinethos.com/explore/coming/
TRANSP:TRANSPARENT
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR