TwinEthosRequest access

Catalog

CoE AI Framework Convention (CETS 225)

Council of Europe (Conference of the Parties) · pack 0.1.2 · verified against the official source as of 2026-09-27.

Standard / soft law

Persons should be notified they are interacting with an AI system (CoE Framework Convention)

Under the Council of Europe Framework Convention on AI (CETS 225, Article 15(2)), Parties must ensure that, as appropriate for the context, persons interacting with AI systems are notified that they are interacting with such systems rather than with a human. Article 8 additionally requires transparency and oversight measures including the identification of AI-generated content. Pending entry into force and domestic implementation, this treaty text is a treaty-level root for AI-interaction-disclosure obligations that national laws may implement. Detect a public-facing AI-interaction path with no notification that the user is interacting with an AI system.

coe-ai-convention.ai-interaction-notification · CoE Framework Convention on AI (CETS 225), Article 15(2) · official source · jurisdictions: INTL

Standard / soft law

Significant AI decisions should be documented and contestable with remedies (CoE Framework Convention)

Under the Council of Europe Framework Convention on AI (CETS 225, Article 14(2)), Parties must ensure that information about AI systems with the potential to significantly affect human rights is documented and, where appropriate, communicated to affected persons; that this information is sufficient for affected persons to contest decisions made or substantially informed by the AI system; and that persons can lodge a complaint with competent authorities. Detect a significant AI-decision path with no documentation, explanation, contest mechanism, or complaint route for affected persons.

coe-ai-convention.documentation-and-contest · CoE Framework Convention on AI (CETS 225), Article 14(2) · official source · jurisdictions: INTL